I am reading Adam Smith's book "The Wealth of Nations" on page 391, the author says, "what Dercyllidas said of the court of Persia may be applied to that of several European princes, that he saw there much splendour but little, and many servants but few soldiers."
General Robert E. Huyser's book "Mission to Tehran" serves as a reminder of his covert mission to Iran, where he met with General Abbas Gharabaghi. The mission aimed to avert any attempted coup by the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces and prevent Iran from descending into chaos under Khomeini's rule.
According to Adam Smith's book, written on March 9th, 1776, his concepts are relevant to Iran's present political situation. Iranians are enduring challenging circumstances and necessitate practical approaches to dismantle oppression. Various specialists propose that a republic system, as opposed to a constitutional monarchy, could potentially be the most suitable choice for Iran's future. It is worrisome to witness individuals advocating for a republic system without thoroughly comprehending politics, as their actions may unintentionally fortify the current regime's grasp on power in Iran.
Iran does not require a theoretical debate on whether to establish a republic or a constitutional monarchy to liberate itself from the dystopian state. The country needs a capable leader such as King @PahlaviReza and a team of strategists to devise a plan to save Iran from the Islamic Republic. At a later time, the citizens of Iran can determine the type of state they would prefer through a national referendum. In the meantime, they are being manipulated as pawns through a strategy of dividing and conquering.
We need to establish a strategic plan and council to liberate Iran from the oppressive regime of the Islamic Republic in Iran and become sons and daughters of Iran to assist King @PahlaviReza in doing his job to rescue Iran from the jaws of the destruction of the authoritarian regime in Iran.
No comments:
Post a Comment