Today`s racism in Canada has nothing to do with Madame Helena Blavatsky Theosophy school of thoughts. Thus, white individuals in Canada do not view themselves as racist.
Today's racism exists, and white individuals want to remain at the top of social hierarchy to acquire wealth, power, and prestige by keeping others at a state of struggle, pain, and suffering.
Why is this person having an assault rifle when we are not at state of war or civil war?
On Saturday, June 27th, 2020, I checked my LinkedIn account and saw a female police officer picture posted. The photo posted by Mr. Darren J. Butt. The image was a public relations campaign to give a soft perception of policing in North-America. The photo used a female person; it did not use a police officer who pumped up with enhancement supplements. In the background of the picture, there was an assault rifle.
I am living in an atmosphere of racism and racism institutionalized; it was a matter of concerning to see a police officer had the power to carry a deadly weapon and to use deadly force. Universal Declaration of Human Rights protects me under article three:
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”2
I made some questions about this matter. Mr. Butt questioned me if I was a police officer? I saw this line of police talk back in the 90s when Toronto Police Officer Mike McCormack, whose father was a Chief of Police for Toronto Police Services, did whatever he wanted. 1
When I pointed the above facts to Mr. Butt, he accused me of being a criminal.
“Wow…I feel a lot of hated from you. Can I assume (now that we are clear on question framing) that you are have a criminal background? Regardless, even a criminal has rights and your opinion does matter in this division as well. Bravo to you! Can I ask what you were charged with and whether you were found guilty or not guilty?“
I responded to him in this fashion:
“I am not a criminal. You are a criminal. It is your past crimes of murdering aboriginal people and stealing lands from them. It is your past crimes of enslaving Africa-Americans. You are a bigot and racist person who sees non white people as a criminal while someone like me is talking about social justice. You are a pure, born criminal. It is natural for you to be criminal. It is natural for you to be a thug. I am coming from a honorable family. I would committee suicide before I dishonor my last name. Now, it is clear that you are a white privilege man who sees non-white people as a criminal. You must be one of those white people who go around and kill non-white people because they are not white. 1 Also, the US needs a regime change because people are living in tyranny. Do not think ever you or someone like you can label me as a criminal. This is why I never travelled to the US and never will do because you folks think everyone is criminal. You are a criminal.“3
In conclusion, white people always think that someone like me is a criminal. White people have a dark, gloomy history.
If police intend to subdue a suspect, a police officer never opens fire at the suspect's upper body. A police officer would open fire at the suspect's legs. Thus, a suspect would be alive—people's lives matter.
1. White police officers hired you as a police officer because white police officers had to meet the legal requirement.
2. You integrated in white police force culture, it means, you lie and deceive during criminal trial "Deviant Behavior" 5th edition by Delos H. Kelly.
3. Police officers do not up hold the law. Police officers break the law to convict people to put them behind bars.
4. The US has the highest rate of having people behind bars.
5. Thus, police forces are not part of social solutions, but they are source of anarchy in society.
Jan
Nesar Captain (Nakhoda Yekom) Houshang Samadi published
his memoir about the war in Khorramshahr during the 1980s of Iran and
Iraq. He used guerilla warfare techniques to withhold the advancement
of Iraqi forces in Iran for 34 days. He received no reinforcement to
push back the Iraqi troops from Iran and forced to retreat from the
city of Khorramshahr and took nineteen months for him and other
branches of the army to liberate the Khorramshahr.
Background:
During
the Mandate of Iraq (1920–32), the British advisors in Iraq were
able to keep the waterway binational under the thalweg
principle that worked in Europe: the dividing line was a
line drawn between the most profound points along the stream bed. In
1937, Iran and Iraq signed a treaty that settled the Shatt al-Arab
dispute over control. The 1937 agreement recognized the Iranian-Iraqi
border as along the low-water mark on the eastern side of the Shatt
al-Arab except at Abadan and Khorramshahr where
the frontier ran along the thalweg (the
deepwater line) which gave Iraq control of almost the entire
waterway; provided that all ships using the Shatt al-Arab fly the
Iraqi flag and have an Iraqi pilot, and required Iran to pay tolls to
Iraq whenever its ships used the Shatt al-Arab. The treaty of 1937
marked a familiar pattern by the British empire of Divide
and rule that was routinely employed in the Indian
subcontinent and other British colonial or influenced regions: it
ensured long term if not permanent tension between Iran and Iraq. As
opposed to using the thalweg principle
as advised during the 1920–1932 period, which would have calmed
down or ended the river border tensions between the two nations. The
Shatt al-Arab and the forest were depicted in the middle of the coat
of arms of the Kingdom
of Iraq from 1932–1959.
In
the late 1960s, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi developed a strong
military and took a more assertive stance in the Near East. In April
1969, Iran abrogated the 1937 treaty over the Shatt al-Arab, and
Iranian ships stopped paying tolls to Iraq when they used the Shatt
al-Arab. The Shah argued that the 1937 agreement was unfair to Iran
because almost all river borders around the world ran along
the thalweg,
and because most of the ships that used the Shatt al-Arab were
Iranian. Iraq threatened war over the Iranian move, but on 24 April
1969, an Iranian tanker escorted by Iranian warships (Joint
Operation Arvand) sailed down the Shatt al-Arab, and Iraq was the
militarily weaker state—did nothing. The Iranian abrogation of the
1937 treaty marked the beginning of a period of acute Iraqi-Iranian
tension that was to last until the Algiers Accords of 1975.
All United
Nations' attempts to intervene and mediate the dispute were
rebuffed. Under Saddam
Hussein, Baathist
Iraq claimed the entire waterway up to the Iranian shore as
its territory. In response, in the early 1970s, Iran became the chief
patron of Iraqi Kurdish groups fighting for independence from Iraq.
In March 1975, Iraq signed the Algiers
Accord in which it recognized a series of straight lines
closely approximating the thalweg (deepest
channel) of the waterway, as the official border, in exchange for
which Iran ended its support of the Iraqi Kurds.
In 1980,
Hussein released a statement claiming to abrogate the 1975 treaty,
and Iraq invaded Iran. International law, however, holds that in all
cases, no bilateral or multilateral agreement can be revoked by one
party only. The main thrust of the military movement on the ground
was across the waterway, which was the stage for most of the naval
battles between the two armies. The watercourse was Iraq's only
outlet to the Persian Gulf, and thus, its shipping lanes were
significantly affected by continuous Iranian attacks.
In 1979,
Mohammad Reza Shah left Iran, and the revolutionary forces wanted to
purge the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to prevent any military coup.
However, Khomeini was the head of state of Iran; he rejected the
proposal.
The newly
established system executed high ranking generals and the army
pioneered on command and control system. Thus, the situation provided
a golden moment for Saddam Hussein to nullify the Algiers accord and
attack the oil-rich part of Iran.
Story:
Nakhoda
Yekom Houshang Samad was born in Azerbaijan province of Iran. He
pursued his education and moved to Tehran. He joined the Iranian
Armed Forces as he loved the army. The army transferred him to the
city of Manjil to advance in the ranger field. He further studied the
art of war by attending a military academy in England to becoming a
marine. He specialized in the art of guerilla warfare and gained the
distinct army award of the green beret.
He was in
charge of Iran's green beret as the revolution broke out in Iran. In
1979, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi left Iran. The army was in a state
of disarray, and some soldiers used illicit drugs. He spoke with the
local individuals not to ransack the military equipment as they
agreed. There were some employees of the armed forces that they
wanted to have a classless army.
He
was tired of the chaos in the army and what he experienced in Iran.
He asked to be retired from the armed forces so he could relax. As he
walked to the commanding officer's office, one Iraqi jet fighter
opened fire close by him. He walked into the commanding officer's
office; he could choose to leave the army or go to war. His honor did
not allow him to leave the military. He went to the city of
Khorramshahr; it was mayhem. The fifth column reported everything to
the Iraqi army. There 700 special forces, green beret, or Takavaran,
were fighting back with Iraqi forces. There were 300 forces composed
of Iran's gendarmerie; it had a light assault rifle like M1
Garand or rifle
like Borno. Iran's police forces, several Revolutionary Guards, and
native individuals.
He asked
from the Headquarter for air support such as anti-aircraft, it never
happened. On some occasions, Iran's Army provided air support, as
Iran's F-4 obliterated Iraq's tank division to the point of no
return.
His
forces used ARPG 7 and 106 MM canon to confront Iraq's armory
division. After 34 days of house to house combat with the enemy, the
headquarter commanded him to retreat from the Khorramshahr. It took
another nineteen months for him to liberate of Khorramshahr.
This is
not a book about war; this is a book about leadership, honor,
courage, and decision-making during difficult times. He also taught
how to overcome Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Hoping
this book be translated in other languages and a movie to be made
from it.
Hoping we
no longer hurt one another but to love one another.
Mr. George Floyd walked into a store and tried to buy a product from a store. He used cash to pay for the transaction. In the purchase process, it became clear that the currency he was using was counterfeit money. A white male police officer Derek Michael Chauvin attended the call, and the police officer had Mr. George Floyd under his knee. Mr. Floyd informed the police officer that he could not breathe. However, the police officer did not listen to Mr. Floyd. Subsequently, Mr. Floyd died in the hands of a white male police officer.
The question that comes to mind, how did Derek Michael Chauvin learn to become a racist person? The answer is obvious; he learned to be racist the way his parents taught him. Plus, when he attended school, he learned how to be racist.
Mr. Floyd’s incident with Mr. Derek Michael Chauvin brought many tears to the wounded eyes of victims of racism here in the USA and Canada. Now, Royal Canadian Mounted Police Brenda Lucki admitted for the systemic racism in its organization. Kindly look at the picture. There are all-white individuals in the background of the picture. The police force in the RCMP does not represent demographic in Canada. Even the police force begins to hire, marginalized individuals, the marginalized individuals, must accept and transform themselves into police culture. The police culture is about command and control, and it is about authority tells you what to do. Thus, the police system will not be accepting marginalized individuals.
Calgary Police Service Chief Mark Neufeld also admitted that its force is using systemic racism. The question is, why is the system waiting this long to acknowledge for wrongdoing rather than fixing itself?
All in all, racism is practiced in Canada from a wide range of the spectrum. It is not just police services in Canada. Racism practiced at the academic institutes, workplaces, and every little corner in society.
Justin Trudeau is Machiavellian Cunning Fox. He has pictures that he painted his face black. (The last election, I cast my vote to him in the previous election because the Conservative Party is worse than Trudeau. Even I will not vote for Peter MacKay, who is married to an Iranian woman because racist people do not have a problem with women. I am not saying MacKay is racist, but I do not know he is. Maybe he has a story, too, that he has not revealed to us yet.)
In 2017, the United Nations released a report that Canada has unspoken policies that violated human rights violations, such as discrimination against African-Canadians. I hope the United Nations’ report would encompass other ethnic minority groups, too. When did several advocates ask Prime Minister Justin Trudeau what are his plans to approach discrimination in Canada? He did not answer them. 1
Now, it is time to get voters’ attention, and he is kneeling in solidarity with African-Canadians as well as African-Americans. I hope Mr. Trudeau understands that people are not naive.
